This page exists in two versions. The one you are reading is written for business owners — plain language, clear outcomes, visible pricing.
The legal version is written for attorneys and litigation teams — methodology, evidentiary structure, chain of custody language. Copy the key below and paste it into the field to access it.
Two service lines. One methodology. Every finding sourced to a document.
Every engagement runs through the same extraction pipeline. Invoices, quotes, contracts, and platform data are processed using computer vision and AI-assisted document intelligence — every line item normalized, classified, and compared at scale. Patterns that are invisible to manual review become undeniable at the level of the full dataset.
This is not a spreadsheet audit. It is a forensic pipeline built to find what was designed not to be found. First conversation is free.
OakMorel operates a document intelligence pipeline purpose-built for forensic invoice and procurement analysis. Every engagement produces a primary-source forensic record with reproducible methodology, traceable findings, and a documented chain of evidence structured to meet evidentiary standards in renegotiation, mediation, arbitration, and litigation.
Document ingestion accepts native format — PDF, image, structured data. Computer vision extraction processes each document against a validated JSON schema with field-level confidence scoring. Every extracted field is traceable to its source document and page position. Human verification is applied to all low-confidence extractions before the record is finalized.
A second analyst following the same process against the same document set will arrive at the same findings. This is the standard we hold every engagement to.
Your supplier quotes one price. Your invoice says another. Somewhere between the quote and the delivery, money disappeared. We find exactly where.
Our pipeline ingests your invoices and quotes, processes every line item, runs SKU matching and description similarity scoring across the full dataset, and surfaces every anomaly with its source document attached. Substitution patterns. Scope drift. Unquoted spend. Direct overcharges. Every finding is traceable, reproducible, and delivered in a forensic record structured for renegotiation or legal use.
OakMorel's procurement forensics pipeline produces a primary-source forensic record from native document ingestion. Comparison runs on three axes: SKU matching — exact and fuzzy match, flagging substitutions where identifier divergence exceeds defined threshold while description similarity remains high. Description similarity scoring — semantic comparison identifying grade substitutions and specification upgrades. Price ratio calculation — unit price comparison across every matched and unmatched line item pair.
A coordinated review attack looks like a bad week. It isn't. It's an engineered campaign — templated language, sleeper accounts, fingerprinted vocabulary deployed across multiple businesses and states. The instrument to detect it is linguistic, behavioral, and forensic. We built it.
Our pipeline profiles every account involved in a suspected attack. Linguistic fingerprinting across review text. Behavioral analysis — posting frequency, account age, dormancy patterns. Network mapping across businesses and geographies. Every finding documented with source data, structured for platform dispute, legal filing, or litigation.
Platform integrity forensics applies computational linguistics, behavioral analysis, and network graph methodology to coordinated inauthentic review activity. Linguistic fingerprinting runs across the full review corpus — identifying template vocabulary, semantic clustering, and shared syntactic patterns that survive surface-level variation. Dormancy analysis traces account activity from creation through attack, establishing timeline provenance for evidentiary purposes.
Attorneys and law firms commission this engagement when they need a forensic record that can survive cross-examination. Not a summary. Not an opinion. A primary-source document with reproducible methodology, traceable findings, and a chain of evidence structured for renegotiation, mediation, or court.
We don't make allegations. We document the gap between what was claimed and what the record shows. What you do with it belongs to you.
Litigation support engagements are commissioned directly by the retaining attorney or firm under a separate litigation support agreement. OakMorel operates as a forensic source — not as counsel, not as an expert witness retained by either party, but as the producer of the primary-source record on which analysis is built.
We do not make allegations. We document the gap between what the record shows was agreed and what the record shows was charged. Interpretation, legal theory, and expert witness designation belong to counsel.
We'll tell you honestly whether what you have is worth pursuing. No pitch. No commitment. Just an honest read on what your documents can tell us. If we don't think there's anything worth finding — we'll tell you that too. We'd rather lose an engagement than waste your time.
Initial case assessment at no charge. We review the document set, assess whether the volume and format supports a forensic record of evidentiary value, and advise counsel accordingly. If the documents don't support a reproducible finding — we say so. Engagements we cannot execute to standard are engagements we decline.
